Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZAQ versus MST. AZMAT BIBI

Claims to be the daughter of the plaintiff owner who filed the lawsuit for sections 42 and 54 54 and the claim to the defendant claiming the ownership of the property for the suit and forbidding the order. I moved in the same manner as the transfer in favor of his wife, 1 / 4th, while the share in equal shares was transferred to the plaintiff who was his daughter and his other daughter also provided proof of distribution of the suit property. Was not, in turn, relieved, in the circumstances, in favor of the plaintiff because he was sued. Or in the interpretation of the special property of being a co-partnership of 318 th shares to be given to the claimant, but they will be considered in the joint possession of the property due to the claimant in the dispute. Can peacefully occupy the property, disposing of the property in dispute until it is disposed of by the Mateo and the outlawed Revisio n were disposed of by the court's photo-verification. And through the amendment, the courts accepted that the plaintiff would be considered in joint possession of the property to the extent of the 318th share of the property, judicial decisions and orders passed on the exclusive ownership of the decree were set aside. ? immigration advocates contact from FR DI Khan lawyer