Find a Lawyer

SARDAR HAROONUR RASHID versus SYED NAZRAN SHAH KAZMI

Section 152 (1) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution rejects the nomination papers Returning Officer for failure to comply with Section 15 (1) (i) of Local North West Frontier Province Reject nomination papers The Returning Officer of Government Ordinance, 2001, in his detailed order discussed only one candidate's case and concluded that he had concealed his property and did not discuss the case of the other candidate. The appeal against the decision was accepted by the District Returning Officer. No cross-objection was filed by the petitioner against the order of the Returning Officer relating to a candidate, the matter was not discussed at the appellate stage and was not discussed for the first time in the constitutional petition. Could, in fact, be the question, the District Returning Officer said in the appeal that he set his opinion on the basis of the record when more than one opinion could be formed on the basis of some FOs in the original or appeal phase. Such an opinion was formulated by a forum that could not be substituted in the constitutional petition: District Returning Office R, which was hailed as the law and the facts of the case, had jurisdiction under the relevant law. The opinion was based on concrete reasons for detailed inquiry, recording of full evidence and in-depth deposition of cases, along with the scope of the paper nomination scrutiny process as well as the constitutional application against the decision of the District Returning Officer. Wind. Excluded in appeal \ r \ n patent advocate from Noshki lawyer