Find a Lawyer

QAMAR ALI versus STATE

Section 302/324 Reduces Situation Includes One Accused (Complainant's First Cousin) Specialist was positive about the weapons recovered from the suspect after being absconded for more than two months. It was confirmed that the witnesses and investigating officer of the food story prior to the fatal injury strongly supported the prosecution's case. And no single dent can be found in their statements. The prosecution proved its case completely, even though the victim of natural weakness could not believe the whole truth of the cross-examination. The eyewitness confessed that he had consulted with another prosecutor. The complainant's brother was the head constable in the police for reporting against one person, the police officer's skill was manipulated and, as a result of consultation and deliberation, the same person was confronted. The person was indicted, indicating that someone else is present, the motive stated in the FIR was that land-based litigation did not provide any justification for the murder of the real uncle. Upon the arrival of the accused, neither the deceased nor the prosecution witnesses indicated that the accused was facing the accused. The victim was found to be approachable and the prosecutor's witnesses could have been easier to be closer to the accused than the victim, apparently with little to no retaliation or reaction. The reaction was caused by such events advocates from Chilas lawyer