DILBAR HUSSAIN ALIAS DILLU THROUGH ATTORNEY versus STATE
Complaints of testimony of Sections 2/2/3434 and 4 of 4 were recorded on the spot after fifty minutes of the police officer's complaint. The complainant, in his statement, did not disclose that he approached the police at the police station. Why fail to do so and prefer to stay behind The complainants and witnesses, on each occasion, were found involved in dialogue and consultation with each other to form their own story, no evidence was supported and this As all the witnesses of the Inquisitive Prosecutor have remained, confessing to the accused the co-accused with the same role as the accused. It was already bad it was, did not match the offense of the rifles were recovered from the accused, the complainant had not alleged in the FIR lays on false facts, but also suppressed several material. The facts in his statements, which adversely affected his testimony, were alleged to have benefited him from the circumstances ubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer