Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus STATE

Definition of Section 2 302 (b) / rere evidence was not compelling to launch a aggravated assault in this case, but they have considered the nature of a source for making false allegations of the accused to detect the accused's innocence during the investigation. Was based on substantial material and was not merely a speculative opinion in which the complainant and the eyewitness were witnesses who lied to the innocent in this case, their testimony was not worth the chance. The presence of eyewitnesses, including the complainant, and their incident were deceived by the medical officer. Eyewitnesses were summoned after the incident and an FIR was registered on suspicion of their hostility. The suspects were acquitted criminal advocate from Lakki Marwat lawyer