Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ ALIAS HAFIZ versus STATE

Witnesses were not previously aware of the accusations of defining evidence in Sections 302 (b) / 34, 324/34 and 353/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), sections 7 (a) and 7 (c). Could not. The suspects were identified at the start of the firing on a dark night when the precautionary measures were not taken by the magistrate in conducting the identification parade of the accused, who had no importance and safely depended on the law. Could go Unless the accused is confirmed, ocular evidence cannot be considered reliable. In the absence of reliable ocular evidence, no medical evidence was obtained because the same thing could be used to verify ocular evidence only. Things got worse accordingly jobs for advocates from Miran Shah lawyer