BRIG. (R.) ANIS AKRAM versus A.S.P., DEFENCE
Article Pakistan 84 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Comparison of Signatures on Signature Requests Petitioner alleged that after adopting computer scanning technique, the respondents had forged their signatures, the petitioner further claimed that The respondents sold counterfeit goods together. Registered property registrants appeared in court and presented the original sale agreement between the applicant and one of the defendants and also presented the original attorney general power of attorney with neither the signatures nor both. Thumb impressions on the documents were displayed. The court had obtained the applicants' signatures and thumb prints on the white papers in the presence of both parties and sent them to the Director (Technical) with the FIA, along with two documents and The report was written that the handwriting exports were positive. The seller's impression of the deal was the equivalent of a thumb impression of the applicant's sample on paper, in view of the FIA's handwriting expert's report, that no further action was demanded from his constitutional Refused to interfere with the use of jurisdiction \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer