The plaintiff sued for the Section 42 statement claiming that he was the owner of the disputed property and the fraud of the registered sale deed executed by the defendant in favor of the second defendant, which resulted in the other plaintiff's Did not own the property and did not give it a valid title. The first plaintiff, the sale agreement, was, therefore, illegal and the trial court ruled that the suit had failed to appeal against such judgment and injunction, and legal documentary evidence convinced that It was proved that the plaintiff was the legitimate owner of the property and the defendant was the buyer. The sale was registered in favor of the property, the plaintiff did not present the slightest evidence of his sale proceedings, which was also filed, only one witness was presented, the appellate court wrote a detailed judgment with a reason. , In which no basis for interfering harmony was found. Request for revision of fact finding was dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
