Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus MST. ASGHARI BEGUM

Section 5, 12 and Article 151 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the application for a delay in filing an appeal to the Section 3 High Court, is sufficiently grounded for the meaning and delay of concession. It was that neither of the two cases was registered. Daily caseload nor additional cause list was obtained by the appellant / applicant's lawyer. Opposition did not deny the fact stated on the oath because the reason for the delay in printing the lawyer's name on the list was due to condolences, as well as the absence of a caseload sufficient to make the delay in filing an appeal. The reasons were quite broad and comprehensive, within the meaning of section 5 of the Demarcation Act, 1908, which was a sufficient cause which depended on all the circumstances of each particular case; sufficient reason did not mean only those circumstances as clearly. Was recognized, but also those that were deemed appropriate for the court word should be given a free construction, so even justice Provided, however, that neither the negligence, nor the unprofessional, nor the desire for innocence was indispensable for the appellant; the delay in filing the appeal was not remiss, so the delay in filing the appeal was waived. The delay made under section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908 and the exclusion of the period spent on obtaining certified copies under the 5% of the Limitation Act 1908, was under section 151 of the Limitation Act 1908 filed by the appellant. ? online advocate from Kacha Khooh lawyer