Find a Lawyer

AZHAR YOUSAF versus STATE

Definition of section 2302 (b) (c) evidence was established by the complainant and the other prosecutor's witness, established in the FIR, who was the son of the complainant, whose recovery was confirmed through the memo. Which was proved by further statement. Another prosecutor, the complainant, admitted that the defendant suffered injuries during the incident, but he failed to mention it in the FIR, and the trial court also concluded that The defense version was immunity and proved on record rather than prosecution Version Defense is coming forward with a more plausible explanation of the incident, in which the defendants admitted that they had struck the victim with a single knife in his defense. The victim along with her two accomplices were attacked by the Sutas. The doctor who examined the suspect and the man sustained three injuries, for example, one in favor of the accused, should be preferred. The suspect stabbed him in the chest of the deceased and crossed in favor of his personal defense, which was the physiologically important part of his death, the incident was not planned in advance by the accused, while for the purpose specified in the FIR. According to the deceased, who along with his teammates and the injured accused were attacked for revenge, and the defense accused the victim of loneliness who, alone in the midst of the outbreak, was left alone without meditation. For this reason, the case will not come under the provisions of section 302 (b), PPC convictions or life imprisonment, but under Section 302 (c) of the PPC. Will get in the car. The lesser punishment was sentenced under section 302 (c) divorce advocates from Matli lawyer