Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 302 (6), 324 and 34 Evidence 5 The accused were acquitted by the trial court and the State, or the complaining party, on the basis of any appeal, was acquitted, in such a breach and litigation. Serious doubts were raised about the failure. The credibility of the eyewitness testimonies presented by the prosecution If the eyewitnesses were disbelieved against some of the accused, who were declared to have specific injuries, then such eyewitness testimony against other witnesses cannot be believed. Unless they seek independent assistance in connection with the alleged incident in this case. While the accused tried to abduct the woman belonging to the complaining party on the spot, the presence of the woman was not mentioned to some extent and in the regular site plan when the incident took place at the FI. The R was not filed and the lawsuit was filed through the trial. Not only the truth of the FIR, but also any credibility attached to the statement, the trial court itself concluded that after reviewing the testimony of the four witnesses by the complainant before the trial court. It was concluded that the prosecution's story was full of serious doubts, and that the four-eyed witnesses, depending on the prosecution, were not produced before the trial court. In this case, the incompetent prosecutor was quite vague and unclear on the basis of the ocular account presented by the complainant and other prosecutor's testimony that the forensic laboratory's final report on both recovered guns was negative because these guns Any of them jobs for fresh advocates from Zahir Pir lawyer