Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus AUQAF DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE, THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS

Section 11 suit / petition challenging the notification issued by the Chief Administrator Waqf Properties defendants, alleging that they were fraudulent property of Hazrat Sultan Zakaria and that the property was not a dedicated property but was privately owned and the Chief Administrator Waqf Properties issued the notification. There is no jurisdiction under which the Administrator took control of the aforementioned court and it was illegal and invalid. Able to occupy dedicated property or courtesy and notification After the trial court had rejected it on. The trial court properly initiated the matters involved in the case, accepted the record and the evidence on the case, appreciated it in its true context, and found out correctly. It was held that the department could take control of the property, as the defendants of the dedicated property did not apply and were not served with the notice in accordance with the law. It was not necessary that the applicants should be heard before the issuance of a notification under section 7 that there is no merit in the merits of the appeal. female advocates from Naseerabad lawyer