S. PAWL versus DAEWOO CORPORATION, LAHORE
A VII, R 2 and Section 96 suit for recovery of money The plaintiff sued for collection of money for work and claimed damages as well as the plaintiff's suit for mental torture and illness. The plaintiff excluded by the trial was in the amount of Rs 14, 00, 000, as maintained by the cashier of the corporation evidence, which shows that the plaintiff himself surrounded the checks, to the other defendant. No money given was on the direction of the corporation if any payment was made. , The corporation cannot be held liable for the rule of vicious liability. The corporation has not been found to have committed any illegal or inaccurate dismissal on the ground that there was no merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Rahwali lawyer
