Find a Lawyer

SYED KAUSAR ABBAS SHAH versus SARDAR KHAN

The prima facie material and the applicant's statement of complaints against the applicant against the applicant's termination of Articles 1 561A, 190, 193, 195 and 476 were not deemed valid by the High Court in the original court, apart from the Appellate Court. had gone. The investigation and trial would neither be premature nor baseless, nor was the responsible citizen responsible because during the flow of denial of some controversial facts, he also denied some harsh facts and a fair degree of justice. This attitude could not be encouraged in the administration process. The person coming to the court was to assist in deciding the matter. He could refuse certain matters and could not be compelled to answer some questions, but day and night, the irreverent attitude of denial pointed to the exception that had to be dealt with by the oath and the statements on oath. And made big decisions. On such documentary and oral evidence, but denial of universal truth showed that the rest of the evidence was without any substance which also showed the applicant's intentionally misleading and uncooperative behavior. Such an attribute he could not afford the common citizen's wish. Life as usual, but when appearing in courts and recording statements on oath, one had to exercise extra caution to speak the best truth to the best of his ability, on the occasion that the applicant made his statement during the inquiry and trial. Will have the opportunity to prove the truth His treatment was still open and he was not put in an undisclosed situation, the appellate court correctly said. law firms from Kahuta lawyer