ZAKIRULLAH versus STATE
Article 302/324/148/149 Definition of Evidence Accused of separating from the original story, accusing the complainant and prosecutor's witnesses of firing in the FIR, charged five persons with indiscriminate firing. The witnesses were injured as a result of the death and injuries, and a passerby was the owner of the complaint. The FIR found only two of the accused accused of verifying the contents of the complainant in court for the prosecution's death and injuries. The accusation completely alienated the original story, and the witness of a passing injury prosecutor edited it. Completely separated from the original story of The number of assailants is dwindling to the point where prosecutors' witnesses have scandalized themselves by presenting an ocular account and have compromised their integrity, altogether different from the original version, and have not relied less on their testimony. May be, despite the recovery of the weapons of the crime, the recovery of the weapons from the accused. Best of all, use as evidence of proof and inquiry The circumstances which gave rise to the recovery of such circumstances did not appeal to the intelligent mind. Such evidence cannot be retained even though the accused's conviction. Despite this, the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer