Find a Lawyer

NASIR MEHMOOD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22, the whole matter of litigation against the granting of further inquiries was that he telephoned the complaining party from abroad to his partner in a disputed amount. Was instructing to pay. The accused and his money were paid in compliance There was no direct evidence available against the accused to show that he had received money from the complaining party The complainant had submitted that the complainant party had been using the audio cassettes Is also in possession of a suspect in which the accused appears to be involved in the crime. The nature of the evidence will be sufficient to contact the accused for the trial, but after recording the evidence from the two parties, Prima Feis said the circumstances were sufficient to bring the accused's case to further inquiry. Are. Exemption suspect in bail was admitted on bail, under the circumstances Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shamsabad lawyer