IFTIKHAR AHMED ALIAS RAJU SOOMRO versus KHAN MUHAMMAD
Section 4 of the Adultery (Hood of Ordinance) Ordinance (VII of 1979, 1979), Claims FIR canceled for the applicants of Sections 11 and 16, claiming that the malicious complainant had accompanied her in the marriage contract FIR was lodged under sections 11 and 16 under the complaint of In the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, it was alleged that the woman was his wife on the basis of the marriage contract, both the applicant and the complainant were disputing the marriage contract with each other. May be resolved only after a full inquiry has been entered. The validity of the marriage between the parties was not an issue which should go to criminal court as the criminal court was not competent to decide and declare the legal status of the marriage contract concerned and had appropriate forum. So as to look at this aspect and decide the matter according to law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
