RANA MUHAMMAD TEHSEEN versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
Arts 199 and 4 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897) Section 24 had a very limited jurisdiction to terminate the FIR in the early stages of the termination of the FIR, as the termination of the FIR To the extent such a request was made in a constitutional petition, there is no power, however, public workers are obliged to decide within a reasonable time without fear, right and dignity of the citizens as in Article 4 of the Constitution. Under section 24A of the General Clause Act, the respondent's Deputy Inspector General of Police did not do so. For the last five months, the petitioner's request for rehabilitation of the former A-section I has been decided, as a result the respondent was instructed to give a proper order as per the law strictly on the applicant's request. Provide appropriate hearing to all persons within the relevant hearing. Constitutional application was dealt with by month
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
