Find a Lawyer

MESSRS AHMED HASSAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF LAW, JUSTICE & HUMAN RIGHT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTH

Article 9, 10, 13, 14 and 32 of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Article 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition filed before the Federal Tax Ombudsman, the President asserted from the applicants the complaint of search charge immunity The bank guarantee was offered by them in the amount equal to 30% of customs duty, canceled and said that the entire amount representing 30% of the duty had been paid, he said. Shipped to the Board of Revenue and Secretary CBR has been informed that import surcharges on locally manufactured machinery are no exception. And the applicant has been demanded to pay the charge. On the filing of the complaint by the applicant before the Federal Tax Ombudsman, the Ombudsman directed the applicant to issue a bank guarantee and advised the department that the charge. Take recovery into action. According to the law, the representation filed by the department against the order of the Ombudsman by the department, which is allowed, the applicant filed a constitutional petition on the order of the President's order justifying the order by the Federal Secretary Law. It has been stated that the applicant was fully represented and filed his / her comments, which is why the Ombudsman did not record any records as to which the import surcharge was not payable. If the surcharge was payable, one of the available recovery methods must be adjusted by the applicant. The bank charge is payable to the guaranteed reasons can not be turned into a constitutional jurisdiction limits divorce advocates from Khandabad lawyer