COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (EXPORTS), KARACHI versus MESSRS MUHAMMAD SHARIF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
The requirements for extension of the appeal tribunal's range to appeal Articles 224, 194A and 196 were to the tribunal to see if the delay was due to the party being out of control and a respectable explanation, a shadow due to a deficiency. Which was submitted for condolences by the default party. Such delays, which appear to be lacking in the present case, once a more than two-month ban on prioritized appeals before the tribunal, have been found in favor of the opposing party, Cannot be left aside or eliminated with light appellants. Being a government worker, he was not entitled to any special treatment in the case of delayed concession; no illegal acts were committed by the tribunal, the order was passed, the appeals were denied. , The appeals against the tribunal's impugned verdicts were dismissed. High court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
