SYED ALTAF HUSSAIN versus SYED AKHTAR HUSSAIN
Section Q 42 will file a lawsuit for the declaration of statute (10/4 984), Arts 17 and 79, which was a Shia slain and the property was changed to the names of the defendants on the basis of will. Was invalid and invalid and neither widow was entitled to inherit the suit, and both appeals were legally dismissed by the courts. The victim's relationship with the plaintiff was not denied at the hearing. According to the evidence, no word was spoken against him. It was the plaintiffs who had proved that they were nephews. Documents certified by law were not required, no evidence of alleged will was presented, the courts did not read the evidence, and the documents on record of the following courts were circumstantial and in the plaintiff's case. The decision on the 3/4 share limit was given to the view that every Muslim was considered as Sunni. The share given by the plaintiffs was not denied. The issue of underage widow was maintained by the courts below.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Malakand lawyer