Find a Lawyer

MESSRS A.B. TRADERS versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE

Sections 83, 168, 171, 179 and 181 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution application and section 83, 168, 171, 179 and 181 of the Customs Act, 1969, applied to the duty clearance of imported goods. Permission was denied Specific prohibition or restriction on their import or any law is enforced under the Customs Act, 1969. Such goods shall not be subject to the detention, legality or abuse of such goods. And had to take extraordinary steps. Showcase notices will require immediate service which reveals serious violations of the law, including, especially in the current case, an attempt by the importer to clear key goods. In the present case and the record, the importer showed nothing beyond the jurisdiction of the patent, which, despite being available or resorting to alternative treatment, invites me to intervene. The constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Importer / Applicants has already been obtained in a treatable manner provided by a law that has the due process, discrimination and appropriate action contained in Sections 168, 171, 179 and 181 of the Customs Act 1969 Had raised points about the violation. The decision in this case was pending, therefore, the importer had a proper remedy before the aforementioned forum, which would consider the importer's merits and decide their decision through a Speaking Order. Was done property advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer