Find a Lawyer

QAMAR ZAMAN versus STATE

Defining section 2302 (b) and 34 34 evidence, the reduction in medical reports showed that the deceased suffered injuries to the fire arm, but the doctor was unable to tell which arm was used and what the duration of the injuries was. It has been reported that all injuries are located on the left leg. The Chemical Examiner's adjournment report was positive at the trial. The court noted several contradictions in the prosecution's case, although all of the prosecution's witnesses supported the prosecution's version, but their evidence contained some contradictions and contradictions, one of which the prosecutor's witness said It was said that the police should come to the scene at 6.30 / 6 pm, while the complainant and another witness had given a contradictory statement and according to them the police was located around 9 pm so it was revealed that the FIR Was filed late and after the opportunity inspection. And the FIR of the preliminary investigation will lose its sanctity in these situations and create suspicion about thinking, manipulation and disappearance. The medical evidence was different in the account as well, according to the complainant. 41 feet away, according to the doctor, depending on the nature of the injury, it could be no more than 3 yards away. The complainant and the other prosecutor's witnesses contradicted the distances in the statement All the prosecution's witnesses supported the prosecutor's version that the suspect was armed with a 12 bore gun and that he had fired at the victim. The truth is reflected, however, by the trial court parties. Relatives, but hated each other when you need a advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer