Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE

Appeal during the hearing of the appeal between Articles 302 (b) (c), 306 (b) and 338E Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 345 and 439 of the petitioner, who was sentenced and sentenced. Filed, there was an agreement between the alleged accused, the complainant and the heirs of the alleged petitioner, which was filed before the High Court so that the parties could compromise, which could be allowed, But the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the applicants / accused. The applicant had dismissed the application for filing an appeal filed before the Supreme Court by the applicant for approval of the settlement. In the same case, the criminal appeal filed by the petitioner against punishment or conviction was dismissed by the High Court and while ruling the High Court, the URT was also attracted to the question of compromise and promotion of crime. Denied the required permission for the settlement as the applicant withdrew the guilty plea for leave to appeal from the Supreme Court, saying the decision of the High Court was still different and the decision of the High Court was intact. Its decision cannot be reviewed before making a decision even though its effect applies at any stage. Maybe, but when it was said that the question had already come before the High Court and a decision had been made, it was not possible for the court session to take a different view. In the absence of any grounds to interfere with the invalid order approved by the sessions court, the applicant's request in the circumstances was rightfully rejected immigration advocates email from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer