Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAGUFTA SABA SEEMA versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE

The second schedule, paragraphs 7 (ii), (i) and section 27, require the privilege of immunity from the High Court of Assisi's claim that the machinery tax brought under the NRI scheme was exempt from taxation of wealth, Its sales proceed and / or the shares are issued to the reviewer. In connection with a sale by a company, it has been stated that the decision on the legal question of the validity of the machinery shall be either otherwise subject to the sale and / or sale of machinery brought to Pakistan under the NRI Scheme. Evidence of the delivery of machinery to Pakistan via Assisi was also required under the NRI Scheme for these types of shares sold (the assessee claimed that all the evidence, including the bill-laying bill, was on record); The sale of machinery to the company; the amount of sales paid by the company and its cost received by the recipient and The purchase of shares or assets, if any, by which the machinery is exchanged or exchanged, or the sale of the shares by a tribunal of such company provided the appraiser with the opportunity to provide evidence to the assessee officer Was found to be unwilling to present evidence, however, in the appeal, he could not review the question as to whether the required evidence had been submitted by Assisi before. The taxing authorities, or any such question, cannot be investigated unless the SCCC is able to clearly and without proof prove the existence of the entire evidence on record. The Affidavit, as stated by the Asset, is neither questionable patent advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer