COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, GUJRANWALA versus SETH RASHID
Sections 162, 163 and 1946 of the High Court have appealed the customs authorities for allegedly seizing the viscous raven, conducting a raid and raiding the department and verifying the evidence / material presented by the defendants. I failed. It was illegal for the department to violate the provisions of Sections 62 and 163 of the Customs Act 1969. Such facts were not disputed by the department during the proceedings of the tribunal's appeal order. Definition of facts and material evidence available on record was not identified as illegal. In the arbitral order of the Tribunal, there was no question of law regarding the need to express opinion for the High Court decision, The High Court dismissed the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Naukundi lawyer
