Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus STATE

The offense was confessed in the FIR by section 190 (1) (b) and 191 amendment code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 109 and 34 of the Magistrate Petitioner, but was declared innocent in the ongoing investigation and They were not invoiced and the Additional Sessions Judge did not invoice. Under the final report of Investigation under Section 7373 Cr, CRPC, the knowledge and applicant of the material presented to him was summoned to face the case. The applicant appeared before the court and was also charged. The petitioner had moved the petition under section 191, CCPC on the matter that he was declared innocent by all the investigating officers, he had an option under section 191, CRPC which The hearing should be from the same court. Or any other court, which was not authorized by the Adel Sessions Judge and taken seriously under the accuracy of Section 190 (1) (c), CCP, the Additional Sessions Judge, on the basis of the content, Used their jurisdiction. Was submitted by the investigating officer during the investigation and in cases whether it was the magistrate who received the invoice or the trial court, including Adele: the session judge was fully qualified to take notice or refuse to take notice of the matter. He or she was admitted by the Adult Sessions Judge. Neither the matter nor the person's case was taken under section 901 (1) (b), CRPC and section 191; CRPC was attracted only in cases where the matter was taken under section. 190 (1) (c), CC police did not have the power to declare a person innocent or guilty as a Magistrate under the law or the trial court property advocates from Pasni lawyer