Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS.2302/LB TO 2306/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 11TH MAY, 2005. versus I.T.AS. NOS.2302/LB TO 2306/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 11TH MAY, 2005.

Section (65 (?)) without additional approval and without the prior approval of the Additional Commissioner inspecting the re-opening review of the case without the approval of the Inspector Additional Commissioner, reopened under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 In the assessment order provided in section 65 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the reference to the permission granted by the Inspector Additional Commissioner Order was not enforceable in law as the officers of the Department were to be known. The word 'approval' is very much meant to provide the law and enforce the law in its original form and context. It was special and it was a legal requirement of the law, and its controversial term `permission was different 'and hence its negligence reopened. The department was responsible for canceling 1979 under Section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance. Appeals filed by were excluded from the ad \ r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Cherat lawyer