INTERNATIONAL BRANDS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE & COMPANY SECRETARY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
The applicant's petition was rejected under Section 195C Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199C of Section 195C of the Customs Act, 1969 for an alternative dispute resolution on the basis that the underlying transaction was past and There was no provision for the provision of a justification for section 195C Customs Act, 1969, but section 195C cannot be construed to mean that an application could be filed irrespective of the time of such application. Whether or not it expires, it has been stated that the provisions may not apply to past and closed transactions. It was a matter of past and closed transactions, there was an open question and there was allegedly a revision treatment that was not banned on the date of entry under section 195C and the goods were not auctioned. Was considered by which discrimination was ordered. Do not disclose that such aspects of the matter were considered or decided by the authority Syed Ard. There was no order of stability in the matter and justice in the interest of the matter and justice. Was separated and after hearing the petitioner, the decision was taken to resolve the matter. In light of the legal aspects raised before the High Court or otherwise through the present constitutional petition \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Hattian lawyer