Find a Lawyer

KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE

Sections 3 and 7 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 165, 165A, 185 (3) and List of Federal Legislatures, Item No. 49 RCC pipe prepared by the City Development Authority in its factory for its use. , Dated 30 6 1965 Such goods were not declared liable for sales tax, but after a gap of 16 years, the High Court dismissed the development authority's constitutional petition stating that the letter of 1965 Will not create any right to be exempt from payment of sale. Taxes and such letter cancellation could not possibly be enforced, nor did the welfare activity of the government's accuracy of prejudice granted to the authority be solely for the payment of free duties legally. In addition to the purposes of determining the ownership of masked property, it will have a 1965 income letter. As a statement of law, no waiver was endorsed so that after the introduction of Article 165A of the Constitution, a false statement of law was always open for amendment and repentance. The court dismissed the appeal top advocates from Madinah lawyer