Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.534/KB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 4TH NOVEMBER, 2004. versus I.T.A. NO.534/KB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 4TH NOVEMBER, 2004.

Section 133 (6) Circular No. 9 of the Appellate Tribunal, dated 21 6 2002 Section RO 63 (KE) / 95, dated 6 2 1995, objecting to the single bench jurisdiction on the ground by exercising powers by the Appellate Tribunal Assisi. has been. That it declared a loss so the appeal is not with this court and according to the provisions of Section RO 63 (KE) / 95, the appeal before the Single Bench on 6 1995 1995 should be decided only. Can be calculated when revenue is calculated. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax did not exceed Rs. 300,000. In addition, only those appeals approved by the Assistant Commissioner of Appeals, which are not by the Income Tax Commissioner (Appeals), can be heard through a Single Bench Income, on the basis of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. Meaning of income was regularly generated by the smsing officer. Assessment level assessment was not technically feasible in such a background, but nevertheless, the appellant's plea bargaining procedure was attracted by the controversy of the Optical Episode / Assisi in the specific situation in which the underlying It was important to consider the minimum level of justice. Despite the above-the-facts assessment, the Appellate Tribunal instructed the Office to move the Department before the Division, as required by the Non-Convention common law-based procedural guidance. Correct an appeal on matters raised by Bench \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Noshki lawyer