Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus PIONEER CEMENT


Section 30, 31 (1) (b), 66A and 136 authorization to make claims for expenses. The question posed by the High Court in regard to the interest paid to the financial institution for the loan is whether the assessee is entitled to claim the expenses, ie the interest paid under section 31 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The financial institution was entitled to deduct any amount that it had spent for the purpose of earning it, which was able to receive it under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by interest on its reserves. Loans received also had to be paid on interest, and this was directly an expense incurred to earn interest and the assimilation under the relevant head. Madani was deducted from the question of standing in the same response.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Timergara lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.