Find a Lawyer

MUZAFAR HUSSAIN versus NAZIR AHMAD

Section 12 and 28 (a) misappropriation of suit proof for the specific performance of the contract was Rs. 50,000 in the sale price mentioned in the contract for sale. The suit property was bought for Rs 70,000. The Sub-Registrar Agreement for Sale proved that the trial court denied the injunction for specific performance and approved the injunction for damages. Such an order was affirmed by the appellate court; the decision of the appellate court shows that it did not read the evidence, the document was written on the direction of the parties. And they were read that there was no evidence of fraud or illicit influence by the defendants, no evidence of market value was presented or the value of the consideration mentioned in the contract of sale was negligent. Inadequate, however, there was no time to deny specific performance. Because the judges were absent in other grounds mentioned in section 28 (a) of the Special Relief Act, 1877, the decisions and judgments of the courts below were set aside and ordered to perform certain circumstances. immigration advocates phone number from Taxila lawyer