GHULAM SARWAR versus STATE
Statement in terms of Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 221/222/223/128/225 (iii) Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 155 (c) (d) Bail, three FI grants The case registered in the two FIRs was normal, but in the third FIR, different versions were given for the same crime in the same police station. The complainant was not a witness to the incident, but he was not involved in the shooting incident. I was there to hear the report. The prosecution's witnesses were recorded after an eight-day delay, although they all belonged to the police force and no plausible explanation was offered, but four police officers were released during the investigation, but Based on that evidence, one of the accused was injured. At the time of the incident, it was alleged that the policemen were not likely to be the working policemen, it was not possible to tamper with, as the complainant and the prosecution witness were all policemen. ? Bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Leepa lawyer
