Find a Lawyer

MST. NAWSHADA versus STATE

Articles 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Articles 103 and 340 (2) Definition of Evidence Examining the defense did not succeed in breaking their testimony or identifying any illicit desire for which I was accused. About the incident, witnesses said that the witnesses belonged to the police department itself, police could not be considered a good place to dismiss their statements. Officials were as good a witness as positive reports from other witness analysts who supported the prosecution's story in the case and also supported drug recovery in this case, Section 103, CRP. The objection to the non-compliance of the C supply was misunderstood because the Section 25 of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 specifically terminated the application of section 103, the PC prosecution successfully began with the allegation of HTM. The accused is accused of instability but statements of defense prosecution witnesses contain any material contradictions or contradictions Had failed badly in origin. He was alleged to have been the first culprit. One of the suspects was an older woman over 60 who was diabetic and the other a poor woman. Both women demonstrated the presence of scopes because of their soft eyes in this case. One of the convicts sentenced to their sentences was reduced to five years - RI was reduced to four years and the other was reduced to three years - RI was reduced to two years \ RI accordingly. With the amendment, the appeal was dismissed and the unclean verdict was retained and maintained \ r \ n \ r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer