MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus MST. RAZIA BEGUM
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner, the controller postponed the termination of the declaration filed by the tenants on the property / premises arising from the request for removal of the landlord. The validity of the application was simply because a civil lawsuit was filed by the alleged tenants regarding the title of the property / premises owned by the tenant, so the rent controller does not have to automatically stop the proceedings until a civil suit decision. Such a claim was disputed. In the present case, the applicant (the landlord) claimed that he had a contract of sale while the defendant (the tenant) was asserting his claim on the basis of the oral sale. In the civil suit, the dispute, the court found that the defendants. (The tenant) was also not prosecuted, and as such, the defendants were rightly dismissed ??????? The provisional injunction requesting for a removal order pending, under the circumstances, should continue as usual. And the leasing controller must decide the important issue of whether the landlord and the tenant's case are interference and invalid order The High Court, too, set aside and remanded him. Matter with the rent controller for processing the eviction request and for expediting the same decision pursuant to the High Court's observations. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Chohar Jamali lawyer