MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Arts 3 and 4 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Defining Evidence The indictment cannot be identified by the defendant in the prosecution's case, by the witnesses. In both cases, lesser crime was laid against the accused, in both cases exceeding one kilo, the accused did not file his petition and he prayed for reduction of sentence and further prayed that both In such cases, he should be punished. Mentioning the error in both the cases, the investigating officer should be instructed to run simultaneously to indicate that his performance was wrong, that in both cases the weight of the marijuana was more than the kilogram of the accused, controlling the narcotic substance. Has been converted into a crime under Section 9 (b). In both the Act, 1997 and in both cases, the sentence was reduced to five years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kumbh lawyer