Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 14, 15 and 51 bail, approval of further investigation `Chars question was recovered from the suit case lying in the vehicle Was gone Prosecution by the co-accused still had to prove at the trial that the accused was in no way related to a major offender or was his agent, co-accused prosecution, first fax, any direct or indirect. Failed to produce evidence, failed to contact the accused. Despite the prohibition contained in the Section 551 of the Crime Commission, the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, nothing was found against the accused, in which case, the accused had the authority to grant bail and his association with the accompanying accused was still pending. Was. After recording the evidence of the prosecution, the court shall make a determination unless it is proved beyond the reasonable doubt by the prosecution that the accused will be considered innocent. That is, the accused's false involvement in the trial of the accused was appropriate for the accusation of the accused's bail; the trial of the accused is unlikely to happen anytime soon; all matters are sufficient that the case of the accused in the scope of inquiry. Be brought forward. Guarantee, under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Nowshera Cantt lawyer