Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MAGISTRATE


Judges agreeing to Section 173 and 190 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420, 468 and 471 Police Rules, 1934, Volume III, R477 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Magistrate, Inquiry Officer's Report The said order was given by the FIR magistrate after the appropriate notice was given to the applicant and the complainant in mind, that the validity magistrate was fully empowered to pass such an order, as provided in section 173 of the Power 3) The following was, under section 190, read with CR: PC Rule 47 7, Volume III, Police Rules, 1934, also provided procedure on the issue which the magistrate had given for reasons. The complainant and by using the framework to give adequate notice and cancel the FIR in the High Court refused to intervene and dismissed the servant circle. Tunnel Petition \ r \ n \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Mehrab Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.