Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 302 (b) and 324 of the evidence were filed with prompt progress, eliminating all possibilities of counterfeiting and the false involvement of the accused, which was specifically designated in the FIR Caused the death of two brothers. The witnesses on the occasion could not be seriously disputed, as the witnesses had no serious motive to falsely implicate the accused in this case. Both the courts made permanent statements before the trial court and their credentials were cross-examined. Could not be lightened during inspection. The witnesses in the trial court had made them sufficiently reliable to rely on them. Eyewitnesses had taken enough account of his presence on the spot. There was nothing available to doubt the witnesses' conduct. The fact that the deceased died of a fireworks injury Me is the fact that the eyewitnesses managed to escape uncontrollably or there were slight contradictions in their statements, for the sake of corroborating their evidence. Although the basis cannot be proved, the witnesses were with the deceased at the time of the incident, and after viewing their claim, the tragedy on the record proved that the accused was guilty of his misconduct under section 242424, PPC. The prosecution's evidence was denied, and the same clause could not be accepted to retain its conviction under Section 2302 (b), PPC. Withdrew because evidence related to the attempted murder was found to be insufficient and the accused were not obliged to avail. Medical evidence was fully consistent with the academic testimony and no dispute was identified in the prosecution case. top civil advocates from Dadu lawyer