Find a Lawyer

NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus PREM KUMAR

Sections 2, 15 (2) (iii) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The first appeal filed by the landlord by default skating increase in rent payment and modification of structure in this case by the appellate authority. Was dealt with. The rent controller should make the point in relation to the increase and change of the structure. Such a decision was not allowed to touch any of the points previously decided by the rent controller. While giving fresh orders, he had already taken the defining points and in that regard had adopted his quest. The defining point in the payment of rent in favor of the landlord, while in addition to the addition or alteration, it was decided in favor of the re-opening of the tenant by the tenant controller on the slating issues, with or without cause. Recording new evidence of the parties' behalf and deciding in favor of the landlord is to abrogate your finding in the first order and thus maintain it by the appellate authority, without any legal reason and without any change or addition. Without just following the appellate authority's directive on Sundering, which is in the constitutional jurisdiction High Court because the property is called before the intervention had achieved the ultimate default status and do not open again criminal advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer