MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII 1979), Section 11 bail, was almost identical to the current FIR grant in the previous FIR, which repealed the main components of forced abduction. The facts made were clearly missing. In the present FIR and some elements of the consent of the alleged kidnapper was also indicated as the FIR stated that confidence was not encouraged because it did not argue that the father, the mother , Brothers, sisters and all other relatives will be together and forcibly accusing a girl of abducting a girl for the thought of being subjected to adultery, she was an elderly man of sixty years with whom the kidnapper allegedly. He was not arrested at the time he escaped. The competence of the accused in this offense requires further investigation within the meaning of section 497. (2), the CC accused was detained for the past four-and-a-half months and could not be retained as the sentence was guaranteed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer