Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAC TEHSIL AND DISTRICT, GUJRAT

The limitation of reference for the acquisition of sections 18 and 54 of the land was that the appellant contended that he had filed the reference before the Collector on time on 9-4 2001, according to the defendants when he was presented before the referee judge on 13 February. When presented, it is banned. 4 2001 Such a dispute would bring the matter to the area, which needed investigation, which required evidence to be filed that involved the parties' valuable rights in the matter and therefore It was not appropriate to flee, therefore, the trial court should have provided the parties with a reasonable opportunity to establish their own petitions on this question if, in the present case, the subsequent order and reference were justified, the limitation would be I cannot decide without this problem being formed. The dispute could not be resolved due to the facts of the case, but the referee judge failed to consider this aspect of the case; in view of the plaintiff's and the circumstances of the case, there was no conclusive conclusion that the case / reference was subject to the law of sanctions. The source was withheld, therefore, not in accordance with the law because the plaintiff / can refer was made by the trial court to the High Court, not to be rejected, accepting the appeal, setting aside the disapproval order / decision of the new decision. Having received the trial court's remand, the referee court was instructed to compile all matters, including this case. Limitations, record evidence on all matters and then decide the entire suit according to the law \ r \ n \ r \ n top civil advocates from Kot Addu lawyer