Find a Lawyer

ARTEX INTERNATIONAL (LAHORE) versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 154 and 59 (1) General Clause Act (XX of 1897), Section 577 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Service Notice A brief document notice was sent by the UPC Inability to comply with such a short document notice in this regard was not finalized as the notice was not received because the notice was examined at the time it was received by post. An incredibly available certificate of short notice notice from the certificate that did not require address signature to recover the post was found to have no evidence T was a short document on the department notice in the case was excluded from the self-assessment scheme by the tax officer through tykssn officer had failed to present any valid evidence. The Notice of Disqualification of Disqualification was indicated by improper service of notice and the arbitrary conduct was ignored by the complainant's objection to commencement of the assessment proceedings under Section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and on this basis it There is no notice to exclude withdrawal from Self Assessment Scheme Ounce to prove that there is no defect. It needs to be dismissed by the department which failed to exclude it because the tax officer's action under the law was a reasonable failure to file a notice of violation of law, disobedience, unfair and power. The reason was not presented. The Administrative Additional Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the relevant tax officer file the collection and expenses under section 59A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 online advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer