Find a Lawyer

AAMIR LATIF versus MEMBER (COLONY), BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE

Section 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition Order, passed in the review of the Member Board of Revenue appointed by the Board of Revenue, which was the Member, Board of Revenue, decided the case. The decision was made keeping the record. Listening to the findings and the law presented by the Member Board of Revenue was not only in accordance with the facts of the case, but in addition to raising some controversial questions concerning it, it was in accordance with the law relating to the issue of disputed questions. , Could not detect any. Strict legal impairment In exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, it was merely to see whether a tribunal or court acted with jurisdiction or whether the evidence of a law or statute violated by the High Court of the High Courts A re-evaluation could not be appealed and appeals were not heard or / and decided by the Board of Revenue members, nor would constitutional requests be decided. Neither the provisions of the law nor the exercise of any jurisdiction, the High Court refused to waive the constitutional jurisdiction in which the jurisdiction is otherwise arbitrary and equitable, especially when the defendant properly It was reported that the first constitutional strip was subjected to the principles of bribery. family advocate from Tank lawyer