MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 guarantee, the grant of the name of the accused was not presented to the complainant for the first time in his supplementary statement following the registration of the FIR. The accused was named in the statements of two witnesses of the prosecution who knew that the accused and his accomplices had stolen articles and killed the victim, which was based on a hearing and, first of all, not credible. There was no recovery from the accused's case against the accused. Section 497 (2), in the circumstances of the CR PC, requires further investigation and accordingly it was granted bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Islamabad lawyer
