Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL

Sections 2 (6) and 14 (o) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001), Sections 2 (XVI) and 152 (o) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the disqualified District Council and Union Council of the nominees Includes distinctions. Any transaction related to specific interests with the local government in which the candidate was a member was a member of the district government contractor and was selected as the moderator of the Union Council Election Tribunal, which led to his special interests transactions. I disqualified the applicant from being engaged. The petitioner, who was instructed to hold the Union Council and the recent elections, had submitted that he was not involved in any transaction of special interest with the Local Government, from which lie was selected as the Moderator of the Selected Tribunal. Had no right to disqualify him under any clause of the law. In the absence of any evidence that the applicant was either a union councilor for which he was elected or in any transaction in which he had special interests with the local government, in which he was a member of the district government. And had separate and independent powers under the provisions of section 2 (xvi) of the Central Government, the District Council and the Union Administration / Union Council. In the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001 and Section 2 (6) of the Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance 2000, the District Council and the Union Administration or Union Council were two separate and separate legal entities in their respective jurisdiction of the District Government. His duties were performed. And misunderstanding the applicant's disqualification question while working independently of one another from the Election Tribunal. property advocate from Sakrand lawyer