Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MOMIN versus STATE

The testimony of Section 302 (c) was confessed to the presence of the deceased in the house of the accused at the strange hour of 2 pm, which the prosecution failed to clarify in the circumstances that the step had entered the house of the accused. The contents of the FIR itself were a witness for theft, robbery or robbery or for having illicit intercourse with a suspected woman who stated in the FIR's defense request that the said woman fled the scene. Was. Otherwise, it was to be treated the same as that given to the deceased, the resuscitation, which was the statement of the informant immediately after the incident and reflected the actual condition, counseling or any possibility of premature death. It was possible to tamper with or construct an episode, therefore, it cannot be ruled out that the accused saw the victim in a questionable photo with his sister n Prosecutors at such a strange time of night. I failed to explain the presence of the deceased in the house of the accused, the statement of the accused under section 342, the CR PC will have to be accepted and his or her partner Will have to fully believe it. The use of a hand-pumped iron rod by the S-culprit also provided the original picture that the commission of the crime was not a professional act, but rather a result of the victim's immediate and indiscriminate provocation. May be. He was charged with the commission of illicit relations with a woman, with the humiliation or unlawful conduct of a woman, but he was sentenced to 14 years RI and reduced to 7 years RI. best law firms from FR Kohat lawyer