Find a Lawyer

NIZAM-UD-DIN versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

O XLI, R 27 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 and 42 Suit Additional Evidence for the Declaration of Title, Preparation of the Principles of the Suit House Died illegally and the plaintiff claims to be his legal heir, suit. Claiming to be the owner of the house, the defendant resisted the case as the buyer from the deceased owner, the trial court ruled in favor of the defendants for valuable consideration and the defendant filed the trial. Preferred against judgment and injunction and also filed an application under O XLI, R 27. , The appellate court dismissed the petition for additional evidence, and not only was the appeal document presented to the trial court for the first time, the appeal was tried Thus, there is no reason for which the appellate court may allow or deny additional evidence, which can be determined without looking into the merits of this case, XLI, R 27, the application d under the CPC core should not have been decided separately from the appeal and it should have been decided at the same time as your application During the trial, the court will review the merits of the case and, if necessary, allow the defendant to register for the purchase of a ticket. Not only was the evidence relevant to the paper writing the contract in the Stamp Vendor Register, which also contained the deceased owner's thumb mark, but also enabled the appellate court to make a fair decision between the parties. Irregularities were removed by the High Court in the jurisdiction of the review and the matter was referred to the Appellate Court O XLI, R 27, C family advocate from Qambar lawyer