ABDUL RASHID ALIAS BUTT versus GULZAR AHMAD
In addition to the statements of the witnesses of section 540 and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 458/380/440/337 H (ii) / 506/148/149, the above witness had filed an application under section 5540, Cr. The prosecution had allowed the aforementioned plea in the private complaint to summon a witness on the basis that the prosecutor's witnesses had summarized the evidence, and the defendant filed the order against it. The review request was rejected. Under Rule 5540, the Resource Court has obtained extensive powers, which are described by this Sessions Court, as a witness to any person at any stage of the legal proceedings, as described in this case. It is necessary for the verdict, it will not cause any prejudice to the accused. Investigating the aforementioned person as a prosecution witness in his or her evidence by the complainant, as the accused would have the right to investigate as the impugned order was not subject to any illegal action, the application was dismissed in Ed. Lemon
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Warburton lawyer